Different Options for Implementing Related Models in Django

In this blog post we consider we have a Post model and its related models that we need to implement in a Django project.

When designing Django models for a Post and its subclasses that may have different forms, you have a few options depending on the complexity and flexibility you need. Here are some common approaches:

1. Single Table Inheritance (STI)

Use a single table to store all types of posts, with a type field to differentiate between subclasses.

This approach is simple but can lead to a wide table with many nullable fields if the subclasses have different attributes.

from django.db import models

class Post(models.Model):
  title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
  content = models.TextField()
  post_type = models.CharField(max_length=50)  # e.g., 'text', 'image', 'video'
  created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
  updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)

  class Meta:
      abstract = True

class TextPost(Post):
  text_content = models.TextField()

class ImagePost(Post):
  image_url = models.URLField()
  caption = models.CharField(max_length=255)

class VideoPost(Post):
  video_url = models.URLField()
  description = models.TextField()

Pros:

Simple to implement.
Easy to query all posts in one table. Cons:
Can lead to a lot of nullable fields if subclasses have many different attributes.
Not very flexible if you need to add new types of posts frequently.

2. Multi-Table Inheritance

Each subclass has its own table, and Django automatically creates a one-to-one relationship between the parent Post model and the subclass models.

This approach keeps the tables normalized but can lead to more complex queries.

from django.db import models

class Post(models.Model):
  title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
  content = models.TextField()
  created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
  updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)

class TextPost(Post):
  text_content = models.TextField()

class ImagePost(Post):
  image_url = models.URLField()
  caption = models.CharField(max_length=255)

class VideoPost(Post):
  video_url = models.URLField()
  description = models.TextField()

Pros:

Keeps tables normalized.
Easy to add new types of posts. Cons:
More complex queries, especially when querying across multiple post types.
Slightly more overhead due to joins.

3. Polymorphic Models

Use a third-party package like django-polymorphic to handle inheritance more elegantly.

This approach allows you to query the base Post model and get instances of the correct subclass.

from django.db import models
from polymorphic.models import PolymorphicModel

class Post(PolymorphicModel):
  title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
  content = models.TextField()
  created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
  updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)

class TextPost(Post):
  text_content = models.TextField()

class ImagePost(Post):
  image_url = models.URLField()
  caption = models.CharField(max_length=255)

class VideoPost(Post):
  video_url = models.URLField()
  description = models.TextField()

Pros:

Easy to query and get the correct subclass instances.
Flexible and scalable. Cons:
Requires an additional dependency.
Slightly more complex setup.

4. Generic Relations

Use Django's ContentType framework to create a generic relationship between the Post model and other models that represent different types of posts.

This approach is very flexible but can be more complex to manage.

from django.db import models
from django.contrib.contenttypes.fields import GenericForeignKey
from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType

class Post(models.Model):
  title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
  content = models.TextField()
  created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
  updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
  content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
  object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField()
  content_object = GenericForeignKey('content_type', 'object_id')

class TextPost(models.Model):
  text_content = models.TextField()

class ImagePost(models.Model):
  image_url = models.URLField()
  caption = models.CharField(max_length=255)

class VideoPost(models.Model):
  video_url = models.URLField()
  description = models.TextField()

Pros:

Extremely flexible.
Can handle any type of post without modifying the Post model. Cons:
More complex to implement and query.
Can lead to performance issues with large datasets.

5. JSONField for Flexible Attributes

Use a JSONField to store flexible attributes for different types of posts.

This approach is useful when the attributes of subclasses are highly variable.

from django.db import models
from django.contrib.postgres.fields import JSONField

class Post(models.Model):
  title = models.CharField(max_length=255)
  content = models.TextField()
  created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
  updated_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
  attributes = JSONField()  # Store subclass-specific attributes here

  def get_attribute(self, key, default=None):
      return self.attributes.get(key, default)

Pros:

Very flexible and easy to extend.
No need to create new tables or models for new types of posts. Cons:
Less type safety and validation.
Harder to query specific attributes.

Conclusion

Single Table Inheritance is simple but can become unwieldy with many different post types.
Multi-Table Inheritance keeps things normalized but can complicate queries.
Polymorphic Models offer a good balance of flexibility and ease of use.
Generic Relations are very flexible but can be complex to manage.
JSONField is great for highly variable attributes but sacrifices some type safety.

Choose the approach that best fits your application's needs and complexity. If you expect to have many different types of posts with varying attributes, Polymorphic Models or Generic Relations might be the best choice. If you prefer simplicity and don't mind some nullable fields, Single Table Inheritance could work well.

in Our blog

Understanding the Security of Ed25519 vs. RSA SSH Keys